From Muse to Reality

Fiction, Politics and Essays

Leave a comment

To Boycott Or Not

I respectfully disagree with Senator Dick Durbin that we should not boycott the Inauguration. He is my Senator; I live in Illinois.

The facts and actions that has played out during the very disturbing and contentious political events need to be part of American history. To cover up the events that have taken place during the 2016 presidential nomination would be a slap in the face of the constitutional process. IMO, boycotting the inauguration is speaking truth to power.

I respectfully add, “Congress shall make no law … abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, …”

Following are Senator Dick Durbin’s words why he is against boycotting the Inauguration:

“My feelings about the president elect are pretty clear but I think there’s a matter of respect for the office and respect for the constitutional process,” Senate Minority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) said. “And absent clear and convincing evidence that he did not win that election legitimately, then I’m going to be there.”

January 18, 2017,

Minnie E Miller

Leave a comment

Dear Mr. Trump

Your being elected President of the United States does not grant you free will that can endanger our nation. The White House is the peoples’s house.

There are no kings in America.

You must listen to the people while running the country. The people voted you into office and can vote you out.

There are no kings in America.

You cannot silence the press while *tweeting* your chosen news. I believe that’s what dictators do.

“Congress shall make no law … abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble,…”

There are no kings in America.

You cannot conduct the business of this nation from your personal Ta Mahal-TrumpTower.

There are no kings in America.

You nor Congress cannot ignore the check and balance amendments of the United States Constitution. Ignoring this system will have a chilling effect on the peoples’ business. And I might add, the last four years of the Obama Administration is a blatant example.

“The system of checks and balances is used to keep the government from getting too powerful in one branch. For example, the Executive Branch can veto bills from the Legislative Branch, but the Legislative Branch can override the veto.”
Congress for Kids: [Constitution]: Checks and Balance.

In my opinion the 115th Congress bears close scrutiny. We may be in for yet another *unprecedented* battle.

Minnie E Miller, Writer


Leave a comment

Wise Food Choices

There is so much information on the site that I cannot include it here. But the below link will take you there.

Don’t have a food thermometer?  This is a very important purchase.

Making wise food choices also includes safe temperatures.


Is It Done Yet?
Use a food thermometer to be most accurate. You can’t always tell by looking.

USDA-FDA Recommended Safe Minimum Internal Temperatures
Beef, Pork, Veal, Lamb,
Steaks, Roasts & Chops
145 ºF
with 3-minute rest time

145 ºF

Beef, Pork, Veal, Lamb
160 ºF
Egg Dishes

160 ºF

Turkey, Chicken & Duck
Whole, Pieces & Ground
165 ºF

An image of foods in the refrigerator

4. Chill: Refrigerate promptly

Cold temperatures slow the growth of harmful bacteria. Keep-ing a constant refrigerator temperature of 40 °F or below is one of the most effective ways to reduce risk of foodborne illness. Use an appliance thermometer to be sure the refrigera-tor temperature is consistently 40 °F or below and the freezertemperature is 0 °F or below.

Minnie E. Miller
December, 2016



Leave a comment

We Cannot Not Vote!

“Since the first Africans set foot on American soil in 1619, Blacks have faced an insurmountable level of oppression despite the Emancipation Proclamation, the 13th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, reconstruction after the Civil War, the Civil Rights Movement, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. African-Americans have “not been able to breathe.”

Absolutely pertinent today spoken by Congressman Hakeem Jeffries, (D-New York).

Minnie E. Miller


OCTOBER 31, 2016

Leave a comment

An October Surprise

The FBI dropped a political bomb Friday regarding emails “…. that appear to be pertinent to our investigation” of Hillary Clinton.

What is clear, however, from this surprise find of emails and the voter suppression in North Carolina, early voting is important. I have already voted.

The following are excerpts from Jason Johnson, political editor at The Root, and professor of Political Science at Morgan State’s School of Global Journalism and Communication.

I neither accept nor reject Professor Johnson’s position. I simply want to report an African American’s point of view.

His excerpts follow below:

“What are the facts and why is this news coming out now? Here’s a quick primer:

“On July 5 this past summer, Comey, a Republican who had been appointed by President Barack Obama as an appeasement measure, held a press conference about the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s emails. The investigation had concluded that Clinton had engaged in no wrongdoing in the treatment, sending of or deletion of her emails. Comey noted that Clinton was careless and should have been more responsible, but said that nothing she did rose to the level of a criminal investigation. This bit of editorializing, not to mention holding a press conference to end an FBI investigation, was extremely inappropriate and, according to Matthew Miller, former director of the Justice Department’s Public Affairs Office, a “gross abuse of his power.”

“Why were we even hearing about Clinton’s emails? Republicans in Congress, desperate to find some smoking gun for the Benghazi, Libya, conspiracy, expanded their investigation into Clinton’s emails. They found nothing. No smoking gun. Not even a half-lit cigarette. Democrats cheered, and Republicans, led by Donald Trump, screamed that the FBI director was in Obama’s pocket.

“On Friday, Comey sent a letter to eight Republican chairs of congressional committees informing them that in the last 24 hours, the FBI had found new emails that “may” be pertinent to the previous Clinton investigation, and that, therefore, he would be looking into them. No timeline for the investigation was given, no explanation of where the emails were from, no context regarding why they were just found. Most importantly, the FBI director told eight members of Congress but did not send a letter, smoke signal, Snapchat or any sort of heads-up to the White House or Obama’s staff.”

“Releasing the specter of a renewed investigation, without any new evidence, and no background context, less than 11 days before a presidential election is clearly a political act and one designed to harm the Democratic nominee. The political, as opposed to justice-driven, nature of this announcement became all the more clear as real journalists investigated this story throughout the day.

“One clear example is that the emails in question are not from any device in the possession of Hillary Clinton. They are emails from a separate investigation into Anthony Weiner, the disgraced former congressman from New York and the former husband of Clinton adviser Huma Abedin.”

There is much more to the article. You can read the balance by going to

Minnie E. Miller


Leave a comment

Monday Morning Thoughts

After watching the depressing second presidential debate Sunday night my thoughts are about the little children. It so unfair that they were subjected to the vulgarity heard, if parents didn’t shut down the television in time.

Donald Trump’s *show* did not surprise me. I knew what was coming; yet he went far beyond his usual attics. Acting like a buffoon, he paced huffing, puffing and intruding into Hillary Clinton’s space. At one point he appeared on the screen to be very close behind her–close enough to feel his breath on her neck. But Hillary held her cool refusing to acknowledge his close presence.

His confession of sexually assaulting women on the Access Hollywood audio recording from 2005 released Friday bordered on felony. Is there a statute of limitations on this type of crime? Perhaps the Clinton campaign should have the recording investigated.

God help the little children!

Minnie E. Miller,  writer.


Leave a comment

Rules of the 2nd Presidential Debate

Source: Quartz, by Annalisa Merelli, October 8, 2016

Rules of the Presidential Town Hall Debate

With less than a month to go in the election, Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump are set to debate each other again on Oct. 9, but this time in a town hall format. The debate will start at 8pm CT (9 pm EST) and last 90 minutes with no commercial breaks. Following the publication the Donald Trump video in which he makes predatory comments about women, the debate is likely to be particularly heated.
Unlike the other debates, the topics for this one aren’t disclosed in advance. Trump has already hinted at his intention of bringing up Bill Clinton’s history of infidelity, and Clinton is likely to further press Trump on the video’s revelations.
How can I watch it?

There are many options, on TV and online. Nine channels will broadcast the debate. It will also be available via livestream on Facebook, Twitter, and Youtube. Here is a comprehensive list of all the options to watch.
Who attends the debate?

Unlike the other debates, the audience isn’t picked at random in the town hall. It’s made up of 40 citizens selected by Gallup, a firm specialized in opinion polls, amongst a group of undecided voters. It’s hard to tell exactly how many voters have yet to choose their candidate, but it’s likely somewhere around 4%.
Who gets to ask questions?

Unlike the previous debate, where the two candidates were asked questions by the moderator and the audience was (supposedly) silent, this format involves the audience. The moderators—in this case Anderson Cooper and Martha Raddatz—will ask questions for the first half of the debate, then the audience will have time for about eight questions.
Who choses the questions from the audience?

The moderators have control over who asks the questions and what questions are asked. It’s not clear how the selection process works, though it’s likely that questions are screened before the start of the debate. A leaked 2004 memorandum (pdf) of understanding from the Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD), the organization that sets the rules and sponsors the debate, shows that very little direction is given about the selection process.
How long does each candidate speak for?

Each candidate will have two minutes to answer the questions. The host can use any remaining time to ask further questions about the topic.
Will the candidates ask each other direct questions?

They are not supposed to, although in the previous debate Trump interrupted Clinton so many times (51, to be specific) so it’s likely that there will be some back and forth between the candidates.

It’s my hope that the debate members, particularly the females, bring up the issue of Donald Trump’s disgusting, reprehensible video showing his disrespect for women during the debate. Becausd this issue needs to be aired openly with no holds barred. If Trump’s words go to the American White House every female will have to fight off aggressive men in the work place. Trump gives them license to do “as the President does”.  This gigantic elephant in the room must be killed before the November 8 election.


Minnie E. Miller